|
2006
2006,
March 30: The Associated Press (AP) reported this week that The Bahamas was
getting sophisticated equipment to detect radioactive materials in shipping
cargo but that US Customs agents would not be involved in supervising the
machine's use as a nuclear safeguard for the American shoreline only 65 miles
(105 kilometres) away from Freeport.
The
Bahamas is a long-standing member of the Caribbean Shipping Association.
In fact the first Annual General Meeting in October 1971 was held in Nassau and
the 10th Annual General Meeting was held in Freeport.
Under an
unusual arrangement, a Hong Kong company will help operate the detector, the
Associated Press noted.
According
to AP, the Bush administration says it is finalising a no-bid contract with
Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. It acknowledged that this is the first time a foreign
company will be involved in running a radiation detector at an overseas port
without American customs agents present.
Hutchison
Whampoa is the world's largest ports operator and among the industry's
most-respected companies. It was an early adopter of US anti-terror measures.
But its billionaire chairman, Li Ka-Shing, also has substantial business ties to
China's government that have raised US concerns over the years.
The
administration is negotiating a second no-bid contract for a Philippine company
to install radiation detectors in its home country, according to documents
obtained by The Associated Press. At dozens of other overseas ports, foreign
governments are primarily responsible for scanning cargo.
While
President George Bush recently reassured Congress that foreigners would not
manage security at US ports, the Hutchison deal in The Bahamas illustrates how
the administration is relying on foreign companies at overseas ports to
safeguard cargo headed to the United States.
Li Ka-Shing
is reportedly close to a lot of senior leaders of the Chinese government and the
Chinese Communist Party but is regarded by US government sources as a
“legitimate international businessman”.
Hutchison
operates independently from Beijing. Three years ago, according to the AP, the
Bush administration blocked a Hutchison subsidiary from buying part of a
bankrupt US telecommunications company, Global Crossing Ltd, on national
security grounds. And a US military intelligence report, once marked "secret",
cited Hutchison in 1999 as a potential risk for smuggling arms and other
prohibited materials into the United States from The Bahamas.
Hutchison's port operations in The Bahamas and Panama "could provide a conduit
for illegal shipments of technology or prohibited items from the West to the PRC
(People's Republic of China), or facilitate the movement of arms and other
prohibited items into the Americas," said the AP report, quoting the
now-declassified assessment.
The
CIA currently has no security concerns about Hutchison's port operations, and
the Bush administration believes the pending deal with the foreign company would
be safe.
Supervised by Bahamian customs officials, Hutchison employees will drive the
towering, truck-like radiation scanner that moves slowly over large cargo
containers and scans them for radiation that might be emitted by plutonium or a
radiological weapon. Any positive reading would set off alarms monitored
simultaneously by Bahamian customs inspectors at Freeport and by US Customs and
Border Protection officials working at an anti-terrorism centre 800 miles (1,288
kilometres) away in northern Virginia. Any alarm would prompt a closer
inspection of the cargo.
The
equipment reportedly operates itself, said a spokesman for the US National
Nuclear Security Administration, the agency negotiating the contract. "It's not
going to be someone standing at the controls pressing buttons and flipping
switches."
Hutchison's ports subsidiary said in a statement Friday from its headquarters in
Hong Kong it was confident that Bahamian customs inspectors would notify US
authorities whenever it is appropriate.
The
administration is finalising the contract amid a national debate over maritime
security sparked by the furore over now-abandoned plans by Dubai-owned DP World
to take over significant operations at major US ports. In fact, some security
experts questioned whether the US should pay a foreign company with ties to
China to keep radioactive material out of the United States.
Giving a
no-bid contract to a foreign company to carry out the most sensitive security
screening for radioactive materials at ports abroad raises many questions, said
Senator Charles Schumer. A low-paid employee with access to the
screening equipment could frustrate international security by studying how the
equipment works and which materials set off its alarms, warned a retired US
Customs investigator who specialised in smuggling cases.
However,
a former Coast Guard commander, Stephen Flynn, said foreign companies sometimes
prove more trustworthy - and susceptible to US influence - than governments.
Foreign companies recognise the US has the capacity and willingness to exercise
a kill switch if something goes wrong, he said.
There are
no US customs agents checking any cargo containers at the Hutchison port in
Freeport. Under the contract, no US officials would be stationed permanently in
The Bahamas with the radiation scanner.
Hutchison
operates the sprawling Freeport Container Port on Grand Bahama Island. Its
subsidiary, Hutchison Port Holdings, has operations in more than 20 countries
but none in the United States.
Contract documents obtained by AP indicate Hutchison will be paid roughly US$6
million (euro5 million). The contract is for one year with options for three
years.
The
National Nuclear Security Administration, which is an Energy Department agency
tasked with strengthening nuclear security worldwide, is negotiating The Bahamas
contract under a US$121 million (euro102 million) programme it calls the "second
line of defence".
It is
understood that The Bahamas government dictated that the US give the contract to
Hutchison. "It's their country, their port. The driver of the mobile carrier is
the contractor selected by their government. We had no say or no choice," a US
agency spokesman said. "We are fortunate to have allies who are signing these
agreements with us."
However,
some security experts said that is a weak explanation in The Bahamas, with its
close reliance on the United States. The administration could insist that The
Bahamas permit US Customs agents to operate at the port, said Albert Santoli, an
expert on national security issues in Asia and the Pacific.
KILL THE BAHAMAS DEAL
Meanwhile, the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review (internet edition)
described the arrangement as “a bad deal” and call for it to be killed.
Under the headline: “A bad Bahamas deal: Was Bush thinking?” the
March 26, editorial stated:
“Fast
on the heels of the scuttled Dubai Ports World deal, the Bush administration
is finalizing a no-bid contract with Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. of Hong Kong to
help operate sophisticated port radiation detection equipment in the Bahamas,
sans any on-site U.S. oversight.
“This
would be the same Hutchison Whampoa, the world's largest operator of ports,
whose president, Li Ka-Shing, is so close to Communist China's leaders and the
People's Liberation Army that intelligence sources are convinced the company
is a front to aid China's strategy of world hegemony.
“Hutchison Whampoa has long-term leases on port facilities on both sides of
the Panama and Suez canals. It monitors traffic through the Strait of Hormuz
and the Arabian Sea. And it's chummy with the military government of Burma to
better keep tabs on the Strait of Malacca.
“The
United States blocked Hutchison Whampoa from buying a part of the bankrupt
Global Crossings telecommunications giant in 2003; national security grounds
were cited. A 1999 intelligence report cited Hutchison as a potential risk for
smuggling arms and other contraband into and out of the U.S.
“The
Bahamas deal is part of a program called the "second line of defense." Given
what is known of Hutchison Whampoa, this country's first line of defense
should be to kill the Bahamas deal. Then it must.”
Meanwhile, The Bahamas Minister of Foreign Affairs, Fred Mitchell said
that U.S. legislators concerned about the deal for the Hong Kong-based
Hutchison Whampoa to operate equipment to detect radioactive material passing
through the transshipment port in Freeport are confusing three separate
issues.

In
a story carried in the
Bahama Journal,
he firmly denied that the Bahamas has opposed the presence of U.S. Customs
officials to assist in the screening.
"In connection with one aspect of this project,
the question of U.S. Customs officials being involved did not arise. It is
incorrect and inaccurate for anyone to assert that the Bahamas government
prevented U.S. Customs officials from being at the port for that purpose."
Minister Fred Mitchell
(Original Photo by Timothy
Clarke)
The Bahamas government agreed to participate in
that programme, and what we agreed to was that the U.S. would supply the
equipment and the training…we figured it’s good for us, it’s good for the
customers of the port, and so we had no objection to that being done,"
Minister Mitchell said.
"The only caveat in our agreement to it was
that there ought to be a protocol worked out so that if radioactive material
were found in any of the containers and had to be disposed of, that it would
not be disposed of in the Bahamas."
By using this site you are agreeing to the terms and conditions outlined below.
Caribbean Shipping Association (CSA) has made all reasonable efforts to ensure that all information provided through CSA's web site on the internet is accurate at the time of inclusion. However, whilst all efforts are made to ensure that the information represented is as accurate as possible, there may be inadvertent and occasional errors for which CSA apologises.
CSA makes no representations or warranties about the information provided through this web site, including any hypertext links or any other items used either directly or indirectly from CSA's web site and reserves the right to make changes and corrections at any time, without notice.
CSA accepts no liability for any inaccuracies or omissions in CSA's web site and any decisions based on information contained in CSA's web site are the sole responsibility of the visitor. |
|